GDPR認定デベロッパー、GDPR日本語版問題集

GDPR学習ガイドの教材には、常に卓越性と同義でした。 GDPR実践ガイドは、さまざまな資格試験に合格するかどうかに関係なく、ユーザーが簡単に目標を達成するのに役立ちます。当社の製品は、必要な学習教材を提供します。もちろん、GDPRの実際の質問は、ユーザーに試験に関する貴重な経験だけでなく、試験に関する最新情報も提供します。 GDPRの実用的な教材は、他の教材よりも高い歩留まりをもたらす学習ツールです。決心したら、私たちを選んでください！

PECB GDPR 認定試験の出題範囲：

トピック	出題範囲
トピック 1	この試験セクションでは、データ保護責任者（DPO）のスキルを測定し、データ保護の基本概念、GDPRの主要原則、そしてデータプライバシーを規定する法的枠組みを網羅します。データ処理原則、同意管理、GDPRに基づく個人の権利など、規制基準を満たすために必要なコンプライアンス対策の理解度を評価します。
トピック 2	データ保護の概念：一般データ保護規則（GDPR）とコンプライアンス対策
トピック 3	GDPRコンプライアンスにおける責任者の役割と責任：このセクションでは、コンプライアンス・マネージャーのスキルを評価し、データ管理者、データ処理者、監督当局など、GDPRコンプライアンス確保における様々な関係者の責任を網羅します。規制基準へのコンプライアンス維持に必要な説明責任の枠組み、文書化要件、報告義務に関する知識を評価します。
トピック 4	データ保護のための技術的および組織的対策：このセクションでは、ITセキュリティスペシャリストのスキルを評価し、個人データを保護するための技術的および組織的な安全対策の実装について検証します。暗号化、仮名化、アクセス制御の適用能力に加え、データ保護を強化しリスクを軽減するためのセキュリティポリシー、リスク評価、インシデント対応計画の策定能力を評価します。

>> GDPR認定デベロッパー <<

GDPR日本語版問題集、GDPRテストサンプル問題

GDPR試験実践ガイドのPDFバージョンは、クライアントが印刷を読んでサポートするのに便利です。クライアントが当社のPDFバージョンを使用する場合、PDFフォームを便利に読んでメモを取ることができます。 GDPRクイズ準備は論文に印刷できます。クライアントが必要とする重要な情報に注意する必要がある場合、それらを紙に書いたり、読んだり紙に印刷したりするのに便利です。クライアントは、PDF形式または印刷された用紙でGDPR学習資料を読むことができます。したがって、クライアントはいつでもどこでも学習し、GDPR試験実践ガイドを繰り返し練習します。

PECB Certified Data Protection Officer 認定 GDPR 試験問題 (Q46-Q51):

質問 # 46
Question:
According toArticle 82 of GDPR, when must aprocessor be held liablefordamage caused by processing?

A. Onlywhen it has not complied with thedata subject's requirements.
B. Onlywhen the processing of data has not been donebased on the instructions received by the organization's DPO.
C. Processorsare never liable, as only controllers are responsible for data protection compliance.
D. Onlywhen it has actedoutside of or contrary to the lawful instructionsof the controller.

正解：D

解説：
UnderArticle 82(2) of GDPR,processors can be held liablefor data breachesif they act outside or against the controller's instructions. Processors mustcomply with the controller's directivesor be held accountable.
* Option B is correctbecauseprocessors are liable if they fail to follow the controller's instructions.
* Option A is incorrectbecauseprocessors do not take instructions directly from data subjects.
* Option C is incorrectbecauseDPOs do not issue legally binding instructions to processors.
* Option D is incorrectbecauseprocessors share liability under GDPR.
References:
* GDPR Article 82(2)(Processor liability for non-compliance)
* Recital 146(Joint liability between controllers and processors)

質問 # 47
Scenario5:
Recpond is a German employment recruiting company. Their services are delivered globally and include consulting and staffing solutions. In the beginning. Recpond provided its services through an office in Germany. Today, they have grown to become one of the largest recruiting agencies, providing employment to more than 500,000 people around the world. Recpond receives most applications through its website. Job searchers are required to provide the job title and location. Then, a list of job opportunities is provided. When a job position is selected, candidates are required to provide their contact details and professional work experience records. During the process, they are informed that the information will be used only for the purposes and period determined by Recpond. Recpond's experts analyze candidates' profiles and applications and choose the candidates that are suitable for the job position. The list of the selected candidates is then delivered to Recpond's clients, who proceed with the recruitment process. Files of candidates that are not selected are stored in Recpond's databases, including the personal data of candidates who withdraw the consent on which the processing was based. When the GDPR came into force, the company was unprepared.
The top management appointed a DPO and consulted him for all data protection issues. The DPO, on the other hand, reported the progress of all data protection activities to the top management. Considering the level of sensitivity of the personal data processed by Recpond, the DPO did not have direct access to the personal data of all clients, unless the top management deemed it necessary. The DPO planned the GDPR implementation by initially analyzing the applicable GDPR requirements. Recpond, on the other hand, initiated a risk assessment to understand the risks associated with processing operations. The risk assessment was conducted based on common risks that employment recruiting companies face. After analyzing different risk scenarios, the level of risk was determined and evaluated. The results were presented to the DPO, who then decided to analyze only the risks that have a greater impact on the company. The DPO concluded that the cost required for treating most of the identified risks was higher than simply accepting them. Based on this analysis, the DPO decided to accept the actual level of the identified risks. After reviewing policies and procedures of the company. Recpond established a new data protection policy. As proposed by the DPO, the information security policy was also updated. These changes were then communicated to all employees of Recpond.Based on this scenario, answer the following question:
Question:
Based on scenario 5, theDPO reports directly to Recpond's top management. Is this in alignment with GDPR requirements?

A. No,Article 38of the GDPR requires that the DPO reports directly to thesupervisory authorityto ensure independence in performing their tasks.
B. Yes, based on GDPR, the controller may chooseany reporting structurefor the DPO, including top and middle management.
C. No, DPOs should report directly todepartment heads, not top management.
D. Yes,Article 38of the GDPR requires that the DPO reports directly to the highest management level of the controller.

正解：D

解説：
UnderArticle 38(3) of GDPR, theDPO must report directly to the highest level of managementto ensure independenceandavoid interferencein their tasks.
* Option A is correctbecauseGDPR requires direct reporting to top management.
* Option B is incorrectbecause theDPO does not report to the supervisory authority, buttheycan liaise with it.
* Option C is incorrectbecauseGDPR does not allow reporting to middle management.
* Option D is incorrectbecausedepartment heads cannot oversee the DPO's work, ensuring they remainfree from conflict of interest.
References:
* GDPR Article 38(3)(DPO must report to highest management)
* Recital 97(DPO's independence and protection from undue influence)

質問 # 48
Scenario 9:Soin is a French travel agency with the largest network of professional travel agents throughout Europe. They aim to create unique vacations for clients regardless of the destinations they seek. The company specializes in helping people find plane tickets, reservations at hotels, cruises, and other activities.
As any other industry, travel is no exception when it comes to GDPR compliance. Soin was directly affected by the enforcement of GDPR since its main activities require the collection and processing of customers' data.
Data collected by Soin includes customer's ID or passport details, financial and payment information, and contact information. This type of data is defined as personal by the GDPR; hence, Soin's data processing activities are built based on customer's consent.
At the beginning, as for many other companies, GDPR compliance was a complicated issue for Soin.
However, the process was completed within a few months and later on the company appointed a DPO. Last year, the supervisory authority of France, requested the conduct of a data protection external audit in Soin without an early notice. To ensure GDPR compliance before an external audit was conducted, Soin organized an internal audit. The data protection internal audit was conducted by the DPO of the company. The audit was initiated by firstly confirming the accuracy of records related to all current Soin's data processing activities.
The DPO considered that verifying compliance to Article 30 of GDPR would help in defining the data protection internal audit scope. The DPO noticed that not all processing activities of Soin were documented as required by the GDPR. For example, processing activities records of the company did not include a description of transfers of personal data to third countries. In addition, there was no clear description of categories of personal data processed by the company. Other areas that were audited included content of data protection policy, data retention guidelines, how sensitive data is stored, and security policies and practices.
The DPO conducted interviews with some employees at different levels of the company. During the audit, the DPO came across some emails sent by Soin's clients claiming that they do not have access in their personal data stored by Soin. Soin's Customer Service Department answered the emails saying that, based on Soin's policies, a client cannot have access to personal data stored by the company. Based on the information gathered, the DPO concluded that there was a lack of employee awareness on the GDPR.
All these findings were documented in the audit report. Once the audit was completed, the DPO drafted action plans to resolve the nonconformities found. Firstly, the DPO created a new procedure which could ensure the right of access to clients. All employees were provided with GDPR compliance awareness sessions.
Moreover, the DPO established a document which described the transfer of personal data to third countries and the applicability of safeguards when this transfer is done to an international organization.
Based on this scenario, answer the following question:
To whom should the DPO of Soin report the situations observed during the data protection internal audit?

A. Soin's internal auditor
B. Supervisory authority
C. Soin's top management

正解：C

解説：
Under GDPR Article 38(3), the DPO must report directly to the highest level of management. The DPO provides guidance and recommendations but does not report directly to the supervisory authority unless required under Article 58 (e.g., in case of noncompliance or high-risk processing activities). Internal auditors may be involved, but the primary responsibility for GDPR compliance lies with top management.

質問 # 49
Scenario 7: EduCCS is an online education platform based in Netherlands. EduCCS helps organizations find, manage, and deliver their corporate training. Most of EduCCS's clients are EU residents. EduCCS is one of the few education organizations that have achieved GDPR compliance since 2019. Their DPO is a full-time employee who has been engaged in most data protection processes within the organization. In addition to facilitating GDPR compliance, the DPO acts as an intermediary point between EduCCS and other relevant interested parties. EduCCS's users can benefit from the variety of up-to-date training library and the possibility of accessing it through their phones, tablets, or computers. EduCCS's services are offered through two main platforms: online learning and digital training. To use one of these platforms, users should sign on EduCCS's website by providing their personal information. Online learning is a platform in which employees of other organizations can search for and request the training they need. Through its digital training platform, on the other hand, EduCCS manages the entire training and education program for other organizations.
Organizations that need this type of service need to provide information about their core activities and areas where training sessions are needed. This information is then analyzed by EduCCS and a customized training program is provided. In the beginning, all IT-related services were managed by two employees of EduCCS.
However, after acquiring a large number of clients, managing these services became challenging That is why EduCCS decided to outsource the IT service function to X-Tech. X-Tech provides IT support and is responsible for ensuring the security of EduCCS's network and systems. In addition, X-Tech stores and archives EduCCS's information including their training programs and clients' and employees' data. Recently, X-Tech made headlines in the technology press for being a victim of a phishing attack. A group of three attackers hacked X-Tech's systems via a phishing campaign which targeted the employees of the Marketing Department. By compromising X-Tech's mail server, hackers were able to gain access to more than 200 computer systems. Consequently, access to the networks of EduCCS's clients was also allowed. Using EduCCS's employee accounts, attackers installed a remote access tool on EduCCS'scompromised systems. By doing so, they gained access to personal information of EduCCS's clients, training programs, and other information stored in its online payment system. The attack was detected by X-Tech's system administrator.
After detecting unusual activity in X-Tech's network, they immediately reported it to the incident management team of the company. One week after being notified about the personal data breach, EduCCS communicated the incident to the supervisory authority with a document that outlined the reasons for the delay revealing that due to the lack of regular testing or modification, their incident response plan was not adequately prepared to handle such an attack.Based on this scenario, answer the following question:
Question:
Based on scenario 7, didEduCCS comply with GDPRregardingdata breach notification requirements?

A. Yes, EduCCS wasnot obligated to notifythe supervisory authority about the breach, since it occurred at itsIT service provider, X-Tech.
B. Yes, EduCCS actedin compliancewith GDPR bynotifying the supervisory authority one week after the violation.
C. No, EduCCS' notification to thesupervisory authorityafterone weekviolates GDPR's requirementfor timely notification.
D. No, EduCCS should havereported the breach directly to affected clientsbefore informing the supervisory authority.

正解：C

解説：
UnderArticle 33(1) of GDPR, controllers mustreport a personal data breach to the supervisory authority within 72 hoursof becoming aware of it.EduCCS delayed notification beyond this timeframe, violating GDPR.
* Option A is correctbecauseEduCCS failed to notify the authority within 72 hours.
* Option B is incorrectbecauseEduCCS remains responsible for reporting the breach, even if it occurred atX-Tech.
* Option C is incorrectbecauseone-week delay violates GDPR's 72-hour requirement.
* Option D is incorrectbecausenotifying the supervisory authority is required first, unless the breach is unlikely to impact data subjects.
References:
* GDPR Article 33(1)(72-hour breach notification)
* Recital 85(Timely response to data breaches)

質問 # 50
Scenario:
Bankbiois a financial institution that handlespersonal dataof its customers. Itsdata processing activities involve processingthat is necessary for thelegitimate interestspursued by the institution. In such cases, Bankbio processes personal datawithout obtaining consent from data subjects.
Question:
Is the data processinglawful under GDPR?

A. Yes, processing is lawful when it is necessary for thelegitimate interestspursued by the controller, except where such interests are overridden by the interests of fundamental rights.
B. No, the processing is lawfulonly if the data subject has given explicit consentto the processing of personal data for the specified purpose.
C. No, financial institutionsmust always obtain explicit consentbefore processing personal data.
D. Yes, GDPR allows the processing of personal data for thelegitimate interest pursued by the controller or by a third party in all cases.

正解：A

解説：
UnderArticle 6(1)(f) of GDPR, processing is lawful if it isnecessary for the legitimate interests of the controller, unlessoverridden by the data subject's rights and freedoms.
* Option A is correctbecauselegitimate interest is a valid legal basis for processingunder GDPR.
* Option B is incorrectbecauseexplicit consent is not requiredif another legal basis (such as legitimate interest) applies.
* Option C is incorrectbecauselegitimate interest does not apply in all cases-the rights of the data subject may override it.
* Option D is incorrectbecausefinancial institutions are not required to obtain explicit consent for all processing activities.
References:
* GDPR Article 6(1)(f)(Legitimate interest as a lawful basis)
* Recital 47(Legitimate interest includes preventing fraud and ensuring security)

質問 # 51
......

CertShikenにIT業界のエリートのグループがあって、彼達は自分の経験と専門知識を使ってPECB GDPR認証試験に参加する方に対して問題集を研究続けています。

GDPR日本語版問題集: https://www.certshiken.com/GDPR-shiken.html

Lucas Johnson Lucas Johnson

Biography

GDPR認定デベロッパー、GDPR日本語版問題集

PECB GDPR 認定試験の出題範囲：

GDPR日本語版問題集、GDPRテストサンプル問題

PECB Certified Data Protection Officer 認定 GDPR 試験問題 (Q46-Q51):

Company

Business

Get In Touch